Oops I Did It Again Had a Baby Video

Inappropriate Outfits Britney Spears Has Been Caught Wearing

Tinseltown/Shutterstock

Since the second she shimmied into the pop music stratosphere as a young and seemingly provocative teenager, the world has been all too privy to the inappropriate outfits Britney Spears has been caught wearing. From day one, pop music's greatest "non and then innocent" showgirl has performed an incredible high wire trick, portraying both wholesome good girl and seductive nymph, and winking every bit she walks the rope between intentional provocation and accidental sexiness.

Throughout her incredible if oftentimes troubled career, it'south difficult to argue that Spears' style has often been at its best, most interesting, and powerful when she's wearing something a footling inappropriate. This is a star who appears to have had a thorough understanding of the manufacture within which she works, and it'south propensity to objectify or otherwise exploit young women for their bodies and sexuality. Spears has ever appeared to be alee of the game on this, seemingly taking charge of her epitome and persona before anyone has the chance to do information technology for her. Only how much of that is actually true?

As the vocalizer has evolved as an artist and a star, so too have questions pertaining to how much agency and control Spears had and continues to take over her life, image, and career. Whatever the truth has been and will be, there's no denying the star e'er looks best when she looks happy and comfortable. Even if that means wearing something well against gustatory modality, convention, and expectations. Hither are some of the best and worst examples.

Was her schoolgirl outfit really then shocking?

If we're going to have a conversation about inappropriate Britney Spears outfits, then we take to start with the OG. The teenybopper'due south "...Baby One More Time" look acquired collective pearl-clutching across the land for depicting a teen daughter brazenly brandishing her midriff (gasp!) while wearing a school compatible well beyond dress lawmaking regulations. The PTA volition be hearing virtually this i, immature lady!

Spears, however, was indifferent to the criticism, telling MTV that her abdomen exposure was a practical pick, not a provocation, "I'm from the South," she said, "you're stupid if y'all don't vesture a sports bra [when you lot] get to trip the light fantastic class, yous're going to exist sweating your barrel off." Regardless, cultural critics repeatedly slapped her with some variation of a "trivial Lolita" epithet, seemingly forgetting that Vladimir Nabokov wrote in support of the young woman of "Lolita," and not the people salivating over her.

By all accounts, Spears downplayed the sexiness of her expect and appeared to exist coming from a place of genuine innocence with it. She suggested to People that the original outfits looked "dorky" and she simply thought that tying the shirts up would "be cute." But was this the absolute truth? Reporter Vanessa Grigoriadis suggested to Entertainment Weekly that she'd been told by "a lot of people" that Spears "wanted to be sexy" while her squad wanted her to tone things downward, and commented, "I think that it's impossible to know if it's actually truthful."

Britney Spears' 1999 Rolling Stone cover controversy

The dust had barely settled on the "...Baby I More Time" controversy before another inappropriate Britney Spears await landed the immature singer in more hot h2o. This time, the teen vocalist posed on the encompass of Rolling Stone magazine in her underwear, clutching a shocked Teletubby to her bosom — the toy probable shared the same facial expression of concerned mothers across the country.

A year later the former Mickey Mouse Club star would tell the aforementioned outlet, "I don't want to be part of someone'southward Lolita thing. It kind of freaks me out." It didn't matter what Spears said, people had their doubts. David LaChapelle, the photographer behind the provocative shoot, suggested that Spears feigned discomfort about the set-upward while her manager was in the room. "Merely as soon as he walked out, Britney said 'Lock the door,' and unbuttoned her shirt wide open," he told Rolling Rock.

Spears told a unlike story, suggesting to GQ that she felt "tricked" by LaChapelle every bit she was only xvi and "didn't know what the hell I was doing." Stating that she was of a "naïve heed" during the shoot, Spears said, "Now I look back and I'1000 like, 'Oh my gosh, what the hell?" (via Britney Boards). Whatsoever happened between the two, Spears has worked with LaChapelle since, including collaborating on the music videos for "Everytime" and the original, unreleased cut of "Make Me" from 2016 (via IMDb).

Oops!...She did it again

By 2000, Britney Spears had obviously heeded the calls for her to put some clothes on, and and so she did. For the "Oops!...I Did It Again" music video she covered upwards her body...in skintight red latex. The video's stylist Estee Stanley told Hurry that although the teen star was "very collaborative" with "Baby Ane More Time" director Nigel Dick on the video, the "thought [for the catsuit] ... was something she really wanted to do."

It caused an absolute sensation, with The Ringer retrospectively describing how the unabridged video'southward "shock and awe divers that moment." A red latex catsuit was i matter, but the way the photographic camera continuously gravitated around the contours of Spears' figure in the thing, was quite another. The song's hook saw the provocateur singing, "I'k not that innocent," which further complicated all discussions around Spears' Lolita image. There was a sexual assailment to the await, which licked at audiences at dwelling like the moisture, scarlet tongue of a Tex Avery wolf.

Salon even described the star equally "[hitting] the camera with a mad-equally-hell trunk, kicking and slamming against the screen," and ruminated, "She'due south Barbie as an activeness figure." However, she was the thespian, non the doll. Every bit Stanley told Vogue, the star "definitely knew what she wanted" with the look. "People didn't wait it," she said, "She was still young and innocent, and so suddenly she comes out in this vixen-like, sexy, skin-tight outfit ... that's what makes her Britney."

Does wearing a snake count as an outfit?

Frank Micelotta Annal/Getty Images

Alas, the full general public shortly became a little desensitized to Britney Spears' bottomless closet of come-hither costumes. Information technology happens to the best of us! Nonetheless, the "Piece of Me" singer knew ane-sure fire style to ensure her 2001 look for the MTV Video Music Awards remained legendary: She used a alive snake as a fashion accessory and functioning prop.

According to Mike Hano, the snake handler responsible for helping to bring the striking visual to life, the reptile was an "amelanistic Burmese python" (via Today). Spears was "extremely scared" of the creature "at first," then much so that she told Hana she "broke out in hives everywhere the snake had touched her," equally he recalled to Yahoo! Amusement. Information technology wasn't just Spears who had an agin reaction to the snake — PETA was predictably furious near the python ...and the alive tiger she had on phase with her, as well.

Per The Guardian, however, Spears reportedly told the animal rights organization that she'd gotten rid of those elements in the performance subsequently the group had reached out to her regarding "the plight of captive wild animals caged and forced to tolerate brilliant lights, crowds and frightening levels of noise." Merely then, she'd already made her impact. Spears entered that stage looking like Raquel Welch in "One Million Years B.C." at some kind of jungle prom, brandishing the snake similar a trophy. Inappropriate or not, Spears made history, and she had undoubtedly been crowned queen.

Britney Spears' pole-dancing become-up roughshod flat

At this point, nobody needs reminding that Britney Spears endured an incredibly difficult time in the mid-00's. When "Gimme More than" was released, it was to be her comeback song — the get-go single from her eagerly awaited fifth studio album, "Coma," which saw the media uncharacteristically rooting for the star. Still, while the electro-pop runway landed favorably with critics, the music video and her overall look did non.

The Guardian'due south Anna Pickard struggled to make sense of Spears' "Gimme More" look, suggesting the star resembled "a city worker in a cheap adjust who's been put through a very hot wash." Pickard further pondered whether this was a deliberate choice, writing, "Perhaps this is a metaphor for Brit's dissatisfaction with The Business." Meanwhile, Amusement Weekly suggested the outfit was at odds with the video's concept, which left the star "walking in circles around a pole  ... I've seen sexier pole piece of work during an afternoon of fly-angling," writer Michael Slezak sneered.

It didn't assistance that the generally blurry vibe of the video bore all the visual quality of a biker baby's bachelorette party filmed on an iPhone i. Worse still, this should have been Spears' chance to rising from the ashes of her troubles — a proud reinvention — instead, she looked charred. As Slant wrote in its assay of Spears' epitome in the video, "It doesn't point to an artist who refuses to evolve, but rather one who doesn't know how — or isn't being immune to."

The infamous 2007 VMAs look

Kevin Winter/Getty Images

Unfortunately, inappropriate outfits continued to pile-up during the misfired comeback of Britney Spears' "Blackout" twelvemonth. The star took to the stage of the 2007 MTV Video Music Awards to perform "Gimme More than," dressed in a glittery bra and panties paired with fishnets. The outfit looked inexpensive, ill-fitting, and completely inappropriate for a performer of such stature attempting to remind the world of her immense talent and power.

The consequence was a critically castigated functioning which exposed Spears' vulnerabilities at a time when she was trying to move well beyond them. According to a study by People, sources claimed that Spears "was supposed to wear a matching corset" — which could have tied the look together — but that "she opted out of wearing at the final minute." Another source said, "She was extremely nervous," and claimed that the star "got out there and froze" due to non having performed live "in front of all her peers" for and so long.

Every bit The New York Times stated following the show, the performance didn't seem similar it would "stem the tide of mean-spirited jokes" about the star. Indeed, Spears had barely left the stage when comedian Sarah Silverman took to the microphone and unfairly sniped, "She is amazing ... she is 25 years old and she'due south already achieved ... everything she's going to achieve in life" (Silverman called her jokes "unfortunate" on Twitter in 2021). In 2007, peradventure the only appropriate outfit Spears could have was a thick adjust of armor.

Coincidental cultural appropriation

Everett Collection/Shutterstock

Not every inappropriate Britney Spears outfit was attached to her sexuality or the persona concocted for her by the media. On the opposite, during The Circus tour of 2009 information technology was a brief incident of cultural appropriation which gave some fans pause. Every bit shared in a Twitter thread on the topic of cultural appropriation in pop music, ane tabloid ran with pictures of the star in what they described as her "Indian costume." Which perhaps highlights the problem that The Washington Posts astutely points out with the headline "A culture, non a costume."

Co-ordinate to a gear up-list shared by the Britney Spears fan-site, the look was deployed for the closing human activity of the second department of the show. At that place, the star performed a Bollywood remix of "Me Against the Music," while flanked by bankroll dancers similarly wearing traditionally Indian regalia. It's quite the fix-piece, and the remix does wonders in renewing the track every bit a live solo piece, as it was originally a duet performed with Madonna.

Still, information technology'south like shooting fish in a barrel to argue that the Indian "costuming" wasn't necessary, and that a chapeau-tip to Bollywood would have sufficed on a musical level without all the additional sartorial bells and whistles. Indeed, that exact notion worked wonders for the star'south vocal "Toxic," which takes its key riff from a sampling of "Tere Mere Beech Mein" from the Hindi romantic tragedy "Ek Duuje Ke Liye" — and without Spears ever adopting Indian garb in the music video to make the reference oblique (via Insider).

Britney Spears' dress of discomfort

Kathy Hutchins/Shutterstock

There are few sartorial heartbreaks bigger in this life than finding a perfect cute clothes, only to notice that A.) it barely covers your curves and B.) it may take too been made for someone several decades younger than you. This appeared to exist the position Britney Spears was in when she wore this leather Christopher Kane apparel to an "X-Factor" viewing party in 2012. Worse nonetheless, her facial expression appears to ostend that she became all too aware of these facts the second those flash bulbs started popping on her. This is not a comfortable woman.

Equally Pop Crush wrote of the "too tight, as well short, and too age inappropriate" dress, "Brit Brit's twins were bursting out of the tiptop" and the fit and styling meant it may "have been improve suited to a teenager." Plain, people of whatsoever age should be free to vesture whatsoever the heck they want, but at a certain age there are sadly some looks that cannot comprise the complete bodacious body of a fully-grown woman. For critics, this was apparently 1 of them.

Fashion bloggers Tom and Lorenzo took further issue with the lace paneling at the sides and back of the apparel which they groaned was "a span too far," and reasoned that the look had potential to be a "pace frontward" in the star's precarious way evolution, but fell short. "If the entire dress was leather — and the bust fit her correctly — we'd love this wait on her," they wrote.

Was this maid look a statement in itself?

Every bit her social media followers accept long been enlightened, Britney Spears' Instagram feed is unremarkably one of pure joy. The singer regularly shares videos of herself doing trip the light fantastic routines, strutting around in her fave threads, or effulgent with love for her partner and sons. And so when the star shares something which derails from that vibe, information technology really stands out.

In 2021, among the legal battle of Spears' conservatorship dispute, the vocaliser started sharing more pointed posts. 1 of which showed her posing in a latex maid's outfit, with an accompanying caption which appeared to reference claims she made during a courtroom hearing that the conservatorship placed added restrictions on her life (via The Guardian). It read, "My maids may have been able to get their nails done during COVID after salons opened but ... at least my maid outfit was the hottest!" (via The Sun).

Spears is renowned for beingness playful with her looks on the 'Gram, but from the odd subtext of the wait to the concerning caption, the maid's outfit was the offset time an outfit felt off on some level. Adding to the business organisation was the fact that the original mail was deleted. The image was later re-shared on Instagram with a new bland caption of some red loftier heel emojis. Unsurprisingly, fans had grown concerned around this time that the star was no longer in full command of her Instagram feed, as The Mirror reported. Was the maid outfit postal service somehow continued?

The symbolism of Britney's Celebrity album outfit

There's one version of Britney Spears' style that every fan favors, and that's the one where she'south gratuitous to apparel as authentically and inappropriately every bit she likes. Point and case? The original David LaChapelle album cover fine art for "Glory," which depicted the star chained upwards in a barely-there gold one-piece — a expect which takes on new levels of symbolism given the details which emerged surrounding her longtime conservatorship (via NBC News). Was it inappropriate? Mayhap. But it was too fabled.

In 2016, however, the album cover art featured a soft-focus shut-up of Spears' face instead. An extremely prophylactic music video for "Make Me" was also released from the album in favor of the hyper sexy original also directed by LaChapelle, which was "partially leaked online," per the Los Angeles Times. The aforementioned outlet noted these decisions sparked a conspiracy amid fans online and the star'south squad went into crisis mode. "Nobody is hiding anything," Spears' manager Larry Rudolph reassured the paper, "[LaChapelle's] video just didn't work."

Regardless, fans were then outraged they even made a Change.org petition demanding that cover fine art be inverse, because it "is not a suitable representation of the music that Britney is putting out." It took time, but by 2020, Spears announced the new cover on Instagram along with the explanation, "Yous asked for a new 'Glory' cover and since it went to number one we had to make it happen!" — and at that place she was, in all her glory.

driggersgeopme.blogspot.com

Source: https://www.nickiswift.com/645847/inappropriate-outfits-britney-spears-has-been-caught-wearing/

Share this post